jianguli@goodlyglue.com | +86-18948072250
HomeNews Influence of Molar Ratio on Morphology and Crystallinity of Urea-Formaldehyde Resin

Influence of Molar Ratio on Morphology and Crystallinity of Urea-Formaldehyde Resin

2025-12-19

Urea-formaldehyde (UF) resin is a thermosetting polymer widely used in adhesives, coatings, and composite materials. Its morphology and crystallinity are primarily controlled by the urea-to-formaldehyde molar ratio during synthesis. The ratio affects the degree of crosslinking, polymer chain structure, and hydrogen bonding, which together determine the resin’s mechanical strength, thermal stability, and surface characteristics.


Molar Ratio and Network Formation

The molar ratio of formaldehyde to urea (F/U) typically ranges from 1.0 to 2.5, influencing the polymerization reaction’s extent and crosslink density.

  • High F/U ratios (≥2.0) promote greater methylolation and condensation, leading to a denser network of methylene and ether linkages. This results in a compact morphology and reduced porosity.

  • Low F/U ratios (≤1.2) yield resins with higher urea content and incomplete condensation, forming shorter linear chains and lower molecular weight oligomers. Such structures tend to be more amorphous and less rigid.

The polymerization mechanism transitions from predominantly linear to highly crosslinked as the molar ratio increases, shifting the resin’s physical appearance from soft and opaque to rigid and transparent.


Morphological Changes

The morphology of uf resin evolves with the molar ratio due to differences in polymer packing and phase distribution.

  1. Low Molar Ratios (1.0–1.3) The structure is dominated by unreacted urea and hydroxymethylurea intermediates, producing irregular particle morphology with rough surfaces. SEM studies show loosely packed granules and microvoids, indicating low crosslink density and poor homogeneity.

  2. Moderate Molar Ratios (1.4–1.8) The network becomes more interconnected, leading to smoother particle surfaces and reduced microcracking. The resin morphology exhibits a transition from granular to partially fused clusters, improving mechanical uniformity.

  3. High Molar Ratios (2.0–2.5) Excess formaldehyde results in over-condensation, forming dense, globular structures with minimal porosity. The microstructure appears continuous and glassy under SEM observation. However, overly high ratios can also induce brittleness due to excessive crosslinking and internal stress accumulation.


Crystallinity Variation

The crystallinity of UF resin is closely tied to the degree of molecular order and hydrogen bonding interactions.

F/U RatioStructural FeatureCrystallinity Behavior
1.0–1.2Predominantly linear chains with urea residuesHigh amorphous phase, weak intermolecular ordering
1.3–1.8Balanced crosslinking with partial chain alignmentModerate crystallinity with distinct diffraction peaks
2.0–2.5Densely crosslinked three-dimensional networkLow crystallinity due to restricted chain mobility

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses confirm that crystallinity initially increases with molar ratio up to about 1.5, then decreases as the network becomes highly rigid. This behavior reflects the competition between chain ordering and crosslinking density.


Hydrogen Bonding and Intermolecular Forces

At lower molar ratios, unreacted amino and hydroxymethyl groups enhance hydrogen bonding, promoting partial alignment of chains and localized crystalline regions. At higher molar ratios, crosslinking consumes these groups, reducing hydrogen bond density and disrupting molecular alignment. As a result, the polymer becomes more amorphous despite higher molecular connectivity.

The balance between hydrogen bonding and covalent crosslinking defines the ultimate crystalline or amorphous nature of the UF resin.


Mechanical and Thermal Implications

Morphology and crystallinity directly affect resin performance:

  • Low-ratio resins exhibit higher flexibility but lower hardness and thermal stability due to weaker network structures.

  • High-ratio resins demonstrate superior hardness, dimensional stability, and resistance to water or solvents, attributed to the dense network. However, excessive formaldehyde content can cause brittleness and increased formaldehyde emission, limiting usability in environmentally sensitive applications.

Thermal analysis indicates that the glass transition temperature (Tg) rises from around 110 °C at F/U = 1.2 to nearly 145 °C at F/U = 2.2, confirming increased rigidity with crosslinking.


Optimal Molar Ratio Range

For practical adhesive and coating applications, a molar ratio between 1.4 and 1.6 often provides the best balance between morphology uniformity, moderate crystallinity, and controlled formaldehyde release. This range yields resins with smooth microstructures, stable mechanical behavior, and acceptable environmental performance.


Conclusion

The morphology and crystallinity of urea-formaldehyde resin are intricately linked to its urea-to-formaldehyde molar ratio.

  • Lower ratios produce amorphous, porous structures with abundant hydrogen bonding.

  • Intermediate ratios balance molecular ordering and crosslinking, giving rise to optimal crystallinity.

  • Higher ratios yield dense, rigid, but less crystalline networks with limited chain mobility.

Controlling the molar ratio is therefore essential for tailoring UF resin microstructure and ensuring desired performance in wood adhesives, composite binders, and molding compounds.


Home

Category

Phone

About

Inquiry